What is this about? A promise our 'Esteemed' Prime Minister made.
Fuel duty is set to rise by roughly 2 pence per litre on April 1st meaning that 66 pence of the average litre of fuel goes directly to the Treasury.
Fuel tax goes into a central government tax pot. It's not necessarily allocated back out to motoring, so fuel tax can be spent on anything – the NHS, housing, pensions or even banking bailouts.
At the height of soaring pump prices Brown made a promise during Prime Minister's Questions on July 16th 2008 not to raise fuel duty for a year.
He stated: "In recognition of the problem people face with petrol, we are freezing duty on petrol for the full year."
Brown broke this promise in December 2008 when he added 2 pence per litre to fuel duty to offset the reduction of VAT to 15% - a move which angered UK hauliers who are able to claim fuel VAT back, but not fuel duty.
He is set to break the promise for a second time on April 1st when fuel duty on unleaded and diesel will rise 1.84 pence per litre. Including the additional 15% VAT on top this will make the rise at the pumps around 2 pence per litre.
The Treasury have said that the only time further changes to fuel duty can take place are at the next Budget – which has been postponed from March until April 22nd, after the duty rise comes in.
Do you think the Budget has been postponed to push through a duty rise unchallenged? Do you think it's fair that 71% of the cost of a litre of fuel goes directly to the Treasury? Should Brown be held to account for breaking his promise not to raise fuel duty?
Thursday, 19 March 2009
April Fool's Broken Promise
What is this about? A promise our 'Esteemed' Prime Minister made.
Fuel duty is set to rise by roughly 2 pence per litre on April 1st meaning that 66 pence of the average litre of fuel goes directly to the Treasury.
Fuel tax goes into a central government tax pot. It's not necessarily allocated back out to motoring, so fuel tax can be spent on anything – the NHS, housing, pensions or even banking bailouts.
At the height of soaring pump prices Brown made a promise during Prime Minister's Questions on July 16th 2008 not to raise fuel duty for a year.
He stated: "In recognition of the problem people face with petrol, we are freezing duty on petrol for the full year."
Brown broke this promise in December 2008 when he added 2 pence per litre to fuel duty to offset the reduction of VAT to 15% - a move which angered UK hauliers who are able to claim fuel VAT back, but not fuel duty.
He is set to break the promise for a second time on April 1st when fuel duty on unleaded and diesel will rise 1.84 pence per litre. Including the additional 15% VAT on top this will make the rise at the pumps around 2 pence per litre.
The Treasury have said that the only time further changes to fuel duty can take place are at the next Budget – which has been postponed from March until April 22nd, after the duty rise comes in.
Do you think the Budget has been postponed to push through a duty rise unchallenged? Do you think it's fair that 71% of the cost of a litre of fuel goes directly to the Treasury? Should Brown be held to account for breaking his promise not to raise fuel duty?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
▼
2009
(99)
-
▼
March
(15)
- Can Any Mother Help Me?
- Lionel Blue, a British Reform Rabbi and Broadcaster
- Help For Heroes
- April Fool's Broken Promise
- Ban Alcopops
- Self Indulgence
- Card Skimmers In Store
- It Was Written
- On Scrubbing Up Well
- Floaters
- James Ravilious - A World In Photographs
- Did The Earth Move For You Darling?
- Was He Looking For Eye Candy?
- People Who Have Let Me Down
- Apathy Monster
-
▼
March
(15)
No comments:
Post a Comment